The unit has developed an assessment system
with its professional community that reflects institutional, state and national
standards. The unit’s system includes a
comprehensive and integrated set of evaluation measures used to monitor
candidate performance and manage and improve unit programs and unit
operations. The unit’s assessment
system collects and analyzes data on candidates, graduates, and unit operations
to evaluate and improve the unit and its programs. Decisions about candidate performance are
based on multiple assessments made at transition points.
The plan
incorporates continuous assessment with systematically administered procedures
and is designed to:
·
determine
whether candidates have acquired program competencies,
·
if
the unit has achieved its aim,
·
enable
the unit to identify its strengths and weaknesses, and
·
determine
areas in need of modification.
The plan
incorporates systematic accountability to facilitate continuous evaluation, is
built upon standards, incorporates multiple internal and external assessment
measures, utilizes rubrics that define levels of performance used to judge
candidate competence, provides credible and useful data used to modify programs
and procedures to improve candidate performance. An annual departmental retreat is held each
August prior to the beginning of the fall semester for the purposes of
facilitating data review. At this time,
all data from the previous academic year are considered and faculty complete
Action Plans to document the data reviewed and any proposed changes and/or modifications
to be considered. The goal of assessment
is to maintain the quality of programs through ongoing systematic data
collection and through the use of this data to continually review and improve
the professional education programs at
PROGRAM COMPETENCIES
Competencies
at both the initial and advanced levels have been identified to guide course
content and practicum experiences and both the initial and advanced level. Programs offered are as follows:
Undergraduate Programs—Initial
Level—Assessments Reflect the 10 Initial Level Program Competencies
Graduate (Cohort Model) Program—Initial
Level—Assessments Reflect the 10 Initial Level Program Competencies & 14 Advanced
Level Program Competencies
Graduate (Cohort Model) Program—Advanced
Level—Assessments Reflect the 14 Advanced Level Program Competencies
INITIAL LEVEL PROGRAM COMPETENCIES
#1 KNOWLEDGE
BASE: The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and
structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and can create learning
experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for students.
#2 KNOWLEDGE OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
#3 ADAPTING INSTRUCTION FOR INDIVIDUAL NEEDS: The teacher understands how students
differ in their approaches to learning and creates instructional opportunities
that are adapted to diverse learners.
#4 MULTIPLE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES: The teacher understands and uses a
variety of instructional strategies to encourage students' development of
critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
#5 CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
#6 COMMUNICATION SKILLS: The teacher uses knowledge of effective verbal,
nonverbal, and media communication techniques to foster active inquiry,
collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom.
#7 INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING SKILLS: The teacher plans instruction based upon
knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and curriculum goals.
#8 ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING: The teacher understands and uses formal and
informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the continuous
intellectual, social and physical development of the learner.
#9 PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENT
#10 PARTNERSHIPS: The teacher fosters relationships with school colleagues,
parents, and agencies in the larger community to support students' learning and
well-being.
ADVANCED LEVEL PROGRAM COMPETENCIES
1.
Exhibit in-depth knowledge of core content, literature, and theoretical base
2. Display detailed knowledge of learners, learning theory, and
pedagogy
3. Utilize knowledge of learned society standards and best
practices
4. Demonstrate application of instructional strategies
5. Incorporate global and multicultural strategies in all aspects
of profession
6. Demonstrate accommodations for diverse learners
7. Exhibit a variety of assessment procedures for documentation of
student growth and curricular effectiveness
8. Demonstrate skill in classroom environments and operations
9. Utilize and apply technology
10. Actively participate in school change process via field experience
11. Be involved in the community beyond the classroom
12. Participate in advanced application of quantitative and qualitative
research with ongoing contributions to the knowledge base and practice
13. Model the role of a leader
14. Demonstrate advanced skills in spoken and written language and
critical thinking
ALIGNMENT
All of the unit’s
assessment tools are in alignment with program competencies at both the initial
and advanced level. Also, the unit has
completed alignment tables to evidence how program competencies at the initial
and advanced levels are aligned to state and national standards as outlined in
the tables that follow:
ALIGNMENT OF the 10 PROGRAM COMPETENCIES AT THE INITIAL
LEVEL to State and National Standards
|
Initial
Level Program Competency |
|
INTASC Standard |
SD DOE *24:16:05 Section
07 |
|
1 |
All
program competencies at the initial level have been aligned with the core
values of the Unit’s conceptual framework, see narrative |
1 |
24:16:05:07
(1) |
|
2 |
2 |
24:16:05:07
(2) |
|
|
3 |
3 |
24:16:05:07
(3) |
|
|
4 |
4 |
24:16:05:07
(4) |
|
|
5 |
5 |
24:16:05:07
(5) |
|
|
6 |
6 |
24:16:05:07
(6) |
|
|
7 |
7 |
24:16:05:07
(7) |
|
|
8 |
8 |
24:16:05:07
(8) |
|
|
9 |
9 |
24:16:05:07
(9) |
|
|
10 |
10 |
24:16:05:07
(10) |
|
|
*24:16:05:07.
Candidate knowledge, skills, and dispositions. A candidate preparing to work in a school as a
teacher must know and demonstrate the content, pedagogical, and professional
knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn.
Assessments shall be given to the candidate to ensure the candidate meets
professional, state, and institutional standards. |
|||
ALIGNMENT OF the 14 PROGRAM COMPETENCIES AT THE ADVANCED
LEVEL to National Standards
|
Advanced
Program Competency |
Conceptual
Framework |
NBPTS Core
Proposition |
|
1 |
Mastery |
2 |
|
2 |
Mastery |
1,2,3 |
|
3 |
Belonging |
1,2,3 |
|
4 |
Mastery |
1,2,3 |
|
5 |
Belonging |
1,2,3 |
|
6 |
Generosity |
1,2,3 |
|
7 |
Mastery |
1,2,3 |
|
8 |
Belonging |
1,2,3 |
|
9 |
|
2,3 |
|
10 |
Belonging |
5 |
|
11 |
Generosity |
5 |
|
12 |
|
4,5 |
|
13 |
|
4,5 |
|
14 |
Mastery |
2,4 |
TRANSITION POINTS
The
assessment system has multiple transition points; multiple indicators have been
identified at each program transition point.
The tables that follow outline assessments made at each transition point
by program:
|
|
Transition
Point #1 |
Transition
Point #2 |
Transition Point #3 |
Transition Point #4 |
Transition
Point #5 |
|
|
Program
Admission |
Prior
to Student Teaching and/or Candidacy |
Exit from Student Teaching and/or Before Program
Completion |
Program Completion |
After
Program Completion |
|
*indicates data used to inform individual candidate’s
matriculation through the program |
|||||
|
Initial Teacher Education Programs |
|||||
|
BA |
--Overall cumulative GPA of 2.60* --Cumulative GPA of 2.60 in content major* --Completion of 45 C.H. --Approval from --Advisor Recommendation --Freedom from Disciplinary Status --Initial Dispositional Assessment* --Completion of --Successful Program Admission Level Portfolio
Review (Key Assessments: Microteaching
LP) |
--Overall cumulative GPA of 2.60* --Cumulative GPA of 2.60 in content major* --Passing PRAXIS II content exam score --Approval from --Advisor Recommendation --Intermediate Dispositional Assessment* --SCPI @ Intermediate Level for EDHH candidates* --Successful PreStudent Teaching Level Portfolio Review (Key
Assessments: Praxis Content Exam
Score; Grades/GPA Content Assessment) |
--Overall cumulative GPA of 2.60* --Cumulative GPA of 2.60 in content major* --Cooperating Teacher Final Evaluation of Student
Teacher and Content Addendum --Final Dispositional Assessment* --PRAXIS II --Teacher Impact Upon Student Learning Project --Successful Program Exit Level Portfolio Review
(Key Assessments: Teacher Impact
Project; ST Evaluation and Content Addendum; PLT Exam Score) |
--Overall cumulative GPA of 2.60* --Cumulative GPA of 2.60 in content major* --Completion of all coursework required for program
of study and graduation |
--Annual Follow Up Survey --Annual Employer Survey |
|
MAT |
--Cumulative GPA of 3.0* or above for the last
sixty semester hours of undergraduate course work --Outside Recommendations --Pre Self Assessment on 14 Program Competencies |
--Approval from --Advisor Recommendation --Passing PRAXIS II content exam score --Cumulative GPA of
3.0* --NBPTS Video Analysis --Completion of 9 C.H. --MA Teacher I Dispositional Assessment* |
--Cooperating Teacher Final Evaluation of Student
Teacher and Content Addendum --PRAXIS II --Teacher Impact Upon Student Learning Project --Diversity Field Experience --WebProjects --Unit by Design --Synthesis Portfolio --Graduate Paper --Oral Examination --MA Teacher II Dispositional Assessment* |
--Cumulative GPA of
3.0* --Completion of all coursework required for program
of study and graduation --MA Teacher --Post Self Assessment on 14 Program Competencies |
--Annual Follow Up Survey --Annual Employer Survey |
|
Advanced Programs for Licensed Teachers |
|||||
|
MAE |
--Cumulative GPA of 3.0 or above for the last sixty
semester hours of undergraduate course work* --Outside Recommendations --Pre Self Assessment on 14 Program Competencies |
--Cumulative GPA of
3.0* --NBPTS Video Analysis --Completion of 9 C.H. --MA Teacher I Dispositional Assessment* |
--Unit by Design --Diversity Field Experience --WebProjects --Synthesis Portfolio --Graduate Paper --Oral Examination --MA Teacher II Dispositional Assessment* |
--Cumulative GPA of
3.0* --Completion of all coursework required for program
of study and graduation --MA Teacher --Post Self Assessment on 14 Program Competencies |
--Annual Follow Up Survey --Annual Employer Survey |
Assessment of Candidate Dispositions
The Teacher Education Program at
In addition,
the unit’s staffing process serves as a formal mechanism for addressing areas
of concern. Candidates at both the
initial and advanced level who experience difficulty may be referred for a
staffing; the staffing process is
outlined as follows:
Candidates
who wish to file a formal complaint can do so by completing the Candidate
Formal Complaint Form or by making use of the College’s Academic Grievance
Procedure as outlined in the Student Handbook. A record of formal candidate complaints and
their resolutions is kept on file in the Education Department Chair’s office.
INITIAL LEVEL
The
following 10 dispositional statements based upon the Unit’s Initial Level
Competencies and the INTASC Standards and with a focus on student learning are used
as the basis for the assessment of candidate dispositions at the initial
level. Through coursework, class
participation, and field experiences, the initial level program candidate
demonstrates the following dispositions:
ADVANCED LEVEL
The
following dispositional statements based upon the Unit’s Advanced Program
Competencies and the NBPTS Core Propositions and with a focus on student
learning are used as the basis for the assessment of candidate dispositions at
the advanced level. Through coursework
and class participation, the advanced level program candidate demonstrates the
following dispositions:
Teachers are
Committed to Students and Learning
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to
recognize the individual differences that distinguish their students from one
another and they take account for these differences in their practice.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to respect
the cultural and family differences students bring to their classroom.
Teachers
Know the Subjects They Teach and How to Teach Those Subjects to Students.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to use
diverse instructional strategies to teach for understanding.
Teachers are Responsible for Managing
and Monitoring Student Learning.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to know
how to assess the progress of individual students as well as the class as a
whole.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to know
how to engage students to ensure a disciplined learning environment, and how to
organize instruction to meet instructional goals.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to use
multiple methods for measuring student growth and understanding.
Teachers
Think Systematically about Their Practice and Learn from Experience.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to
critically examine their practice on a regular basis to deepen knowledge,
expand their repertoire of skills, and incorporate new findings into their
practice.
Teachers
are Members of Learning Communities.
·
The advanced program candidate is disposed to
collaborate with others to improve student learning.
Assessment of Unit
Operations